county and borough) boundaries; and. This was contested by the Conservatives, so the Home Secretary, James Callaghan, introduced the orders creating them but his party whips instructed their MPs to vote them down: they did, and the 1970 election was held in the old seats – producing the largest malapportionment bias component ever for the entire period 1950–2010.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your
Where one wins out over the other comprehensively in areas like Swindon, however, then the bias should be strongly in its favour. The Conservatives exacerbated that potential difference by a further clause in the Bill: the number of constituencies, currently 650, was to be fixed at 600 (a 7.7 per cent reduction).
The Commissions’ revised recommendations favoured the Conservatives, with a 14-seat advantage over Labour, and the Liberal Democrats disadvantage was considerably reduced relative to the provisional recommendations. A party whose support is concentrated in relatively small constituencies will get more seats, relative to its overall share of the votes cast, than another party which gets the same share of the votes but its support is concentrated in the larger constituencies (Johnston et al. Full sets of provisional recommended constituencies were published for England, Northern Ireland and Scotland in late 2011 and for Wales in early 2012. Classic gerrymandering occurs by a combination of “packing” and “cracking,” which means that a small number of districts are “packed” with overly large numbers of a target group, and the remaining members of the group are “cracked” among the remaining districts. Creating constituencies with roughly similar sized populations is a laudable aim. There was a final reason.
There isn't deliberate gerrymandering, no. 2
for this article. But what about 2020? Reference Rossiter, Johnston and Pattie2013). The reality is rather different – and that’s an understatement.
If the Commissions’ final recommendations had been delivered to and accepted by Parliament in October 2013 the Conservatives would have gone into the 2015 election in a stronger position than if it was to be fought in the same constituencies in which they failed to win outright in 2010.
In general, inner city constituencies experienced substantial (relative if not absolute) decline whereas the outer suburbs and towns beyond suburbia grew relatively rapidly so over time the variation in constituency electorates increased. Reference Johnston, Pattie, Dorling and Rossiter2001). The discussion of the bias estimates for a three-party system (Table 3) is more revealing here. They didn’t want their constituencies altered that frequently and the Conservative government amended the legislation in 1958 so that redistributions occurred only every 10–15 years. Analysis of the prematurely ended redistribution under a new set of rules crafted to promote the Conservatives’ interests has shown how removal of malapportionment and well-crafted ‘gerrymandering by consultation’ could have placed them in a much stronger position to fight the 2015 general election than their failure to get that redistribution completed means. gerrymandering and malapportionment at all UK general elections since 1950, the first fought in constituencies defined by the Boundary Commissions. 9 Would the Liberal Democrat vote collapse, perhaps enabling the Conservatives to win some of that party’s vulnerable seats and/or helping Labour advance elsewhere? one more than the second-placed party’s total; and effective votes are those that win the seats. and This reflects the impact of the Commissions’ decisions on the relative success of the Liberal Democrats, Plaid Cymru and the Scottish National Party. Among other things, the census requires the redrawing of congressional and state legislative district lines in response to population changes and redistributions. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings. And they learned that how that map is redrawn can be crucial to their electoral prospects. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. What share of the vote would the UK Independence Party (UKIP) get, compared to its performance at the 2014 European Parliament elections – and if it was at all substantial, which other parties would be hurt most?
Elsewhere, the same held true for the Conservatives although – particularly after the rise of the Liberal Democrats in many parts of England – rarely across an entire county or borough. (Those concessions might include some minor changes to the rules and/or retaining the number of MPs at 650.)
They initially proposed abolition of Local Inquiries; there were to be written representations only. A party’s electoral strategy should aim to maximise its effective votes and minimise the other two: its goal should be to ‘win small but lose big’, though not playing it too cleverly, misjudging any local situations and losing some that it should win (a small majority can readily become a small loss). Slashing the number of MPs from 650 to 600 given our growing population is, at the outset, “daft”, as Labour’s Chris Bryant puts it. Available for everyone, funded by readers, Labour calls government plans to reduce size of Commons undemocratic, Government does not have parliamentary support for revised boundary changes, which would boost Tory election win chances, say Labour and Lib Dems, Proposals to trim seats in Commons to 600 will be dropped as Conservatives fear they will not get vote through parliament, Times reports, Politician describes boundary commission plan as ‘travesty of history and democracy’ amid calls for legal and direct action. It will make it that little bit harder for already overburdened MPs to deal with their constituents’ issues, particularly in inner-city communities with complex social problems (which tend, of course, to be represented by Labour MPs). These were received and considered, and by early 2013 much had been done to finalise the recommendations. The local Conservatives did propose ward-splitting in Gloucester, but the national coordinators did not support this, merely noting that the Commission should consider the proposal seriously – which it did, and included two split wards there in its revised proposals; none of the other proposals for split wards elsewhere were accepted. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. Labour’s submission (like the Conservatives’) had no constituencies crossing the boundary with North Yorkshire. Table 3 shows the number of seats that each party won in 2010 (when Great Britain had 632 MPs) and its estimated number in each of the various schemes. Each of the three parties’ alternative schemes would have substantially altered the direction of the bias if implemented, however: if the Conservatives’ scheme had been adopted in its entirety, for example, it would have given that party a 25-seat advantage over Labour; Labour’s scheme would have given it an 11-seat advantage over its main opponent (in both cases with the Liberal Democrats’ disadvantage being exacerbated); and if the latter’s scheme had been adopted, that disadvantage would have been reduced to less than in the Commissions’ provisional proposals, with the Conservatives having a 10-seat advantage over Labour. Change ). That situation continued after the revised recommendations were published. But the bias then was much more in Labour’s favour than it was for the Conservatives in their 1983 and 1987 landslides. Table 3 The Result of the 2010 General Election in Great Britain, by Number of Seats Won, and in Various Alternative Configurations of 584 Constituencies.
This is not the first time such a shift has been proclaimed – although in this case it is based on the ‘facts’ of a general election result rather than the ‘maybes’ of opinion poll data in the months preceding a contest. The Conservatives slowly realised the disadvantage they were suffering under: after 2001 some – notably Andrew Tyrie (Reference Tyrie2004) – were arguing that the rules should be changed. 3 4
What Will Become of the May 2015 UK Parliament if Scotland Votes “Yes” on Independence?
10 A ruthless gerrymandering of British democracy to favour the partisan interests of the Conservative party: that’s what the new electoral boundary proposals amount to. They did, and the 1997 contest was fought in them but – as for Labour in 1970 and 1983 – it didn’t ensure victory. Elections may be nominally free, but governments engage in extensive gerrymandering, manipulation of voter registration and harassment of opposition parties. The reviews continued, however, until in January 2013 an amendment to the Electoral Registration and Administration Bill was successfully introduced by four peers that would delay implementation of the new Rules for Redistribution until 2016.
To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. It completely outflanked the Conservatives – who complacently assumed that they would again benefit by some 20 seats from the redistribution – and in some places significantly changed the electoral complexion. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply. But the rest of the Tory case is superficially appealing: there is a need to address Labour’s inbuilt advantage, and ensure that each constituency contains a roughly equally sized population.
gerrymandering – uk style Malapportionment was not the sole cause of Labour’s significant advantages in the operation of the electoral system from 1992 on: it benefited more from both the geography of abstentions (much higher in its heartland seats than in those traditionally won by the Conservatives) and the efficiency of the geographical distribution of its votes.