Indeed, the summary treatment accorded an argument based upon an individual's claim that the First Amendment protected certain utterances indicates that the Court at earlier dates placed no unique emphasis upon that right. The eleven petitioners were: 1.
It was one in a long line of laws aimed at restricting public expression during wartime. 671, 18 U.S.C.
We have tutors online 24/7 who can help you get unstuck. Web. Benjamin J. Davis – Chairman of the CPUSA's Legislative Committee 2. Is this right? 336. In his brief dissent, Justice Black wrote that the charges against the defendants were a case of "prior censorship," or punishing them for things that they might at some point do rather than what they had already done. Justice Tom C. Clark did not participate in the hearing or in the subsequent ruling. Can you be charged for promoting criminal activity even though you committed no criminal act? ", He goes on to argue that while the 1st Amendment is valid at all times—including during war—the rights ensured by it are not meant to be taken literally at all times, writing, "The soil in which the Bill of Rights grew was not a soil of arid pedantry. Anne Arcist hates everything and everyone. These laws, although ostensibly a means of protecting the country from potential threats, were most often based in anti-immigrant sentiment. Hollywood blacklisted actors and performers suspected of being members of leftist organizations, and public signage equated being "Red" with being un-American or against the United States.
The party members who had been petitioning for socialist reforms claimed that the act violated their First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and that they served no clear and present danger to the nation. Dennis v. United States, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 4, 1951, upheld the constitutionality of the Smith Act (1940), which made it a criminal offense to advocate the violent overthrow of the government or to organize or be a member of any group or … Interestingly, they did not find that the "probable danger" in question needed to be especially likely.
With this he positions communism as inherently un-American. 1. He wrote, "As an ideology, it is not one of spontaneous protest arising from American working-class experience. Citation 341 US 494 (1951) Argued. Dennis v. United States. ", In his concurring opinion Justice Frankfurter describes the ruling of the initial jury as follows: "On the basis of the instructions, the jury found, for the purpose of our review, that the advocacy which the defendants conspired to promote was to be a rule of action, by language reasonably calculated to incite persons to such action, and was intended to cause the overthrow of the Government by force and violence as soon as circumstances permit. The Smith Act was passed in 1940, shortly before the United States entered World War II. The belief that communists and other leftists posed an existential threat to the United States was very real, although often based less on the actual actions of the group in question than on suspicions of Soviet intent and overblown propaganda. Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494 (1951) Dennis v. United States. However, those changes did not help those who were indicted as part of the Dennis case. Course Hero.
The Petitioners, Dennis and others (Petitioners) were convicted for (1) willfully and knowingly conspiring to organize as the Communist Party of the United States, a group whose members advocated the overthrow of the United States government by force and (2) willfully and knowingly advocating and teaching the duty to do the same. She posted her mission along with instructions to make crystal meth, ecstasy, and mollies.
The pretrial motion to quash the indictment on the grounds, inter alia, that the statute was unconstitutional was denied, United States v. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. Dennis v. United States Study Guide. The Smith Act put particular limits on speech that protested or criticized the government. Despite the lack of evidence against them, the defendants were found guilty in their original trial, and their five-year prison sentence and $10,000 fine were upheld on appeal.
Copyright © 2016.
Dennis v. United States | Summary & Analysis Share. Course Hero. Although the entirety of the case included all 11 men, Eugene Dennis was the one who became the primary petitioner, so his name is most closely associated with the case. Have study documents to share about Dennis v. United States? In his dissent Justice Douglas broadly agrees with Black that there were no grounds to charge the men with conspiracy to overthrow the government, and that had there been, he would have joined the majority opinion. (1946 ed.) Decided by Vinson Court . Opinions. Although conflict occurred between proxy states, such as in the Vietnam and Korean Wars, the direct conflict between the United States and Soviet Union was largely psychological and ideological, as both countries tried to supplant the other in influence. Once her blog gained notoriety, the police arrested her even though she had not manufactured, distributed, or even used the drugs.
Further, the Soviet Union was backing communist groups around the world and advocated for global revolution. Course Hero is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university. Course Hero, Inc. As a reminder, you may only use Course Hero content for your own personal use and may not copy, distribute, or otherwise exploit it for any other purpose.
Location Communist Party Headquarters. The law required that registration include gathering information on "(1) the date and place of entry of the alien into the United States; (2) activities in which he has been and intends to be engaged; (3) the length of time he expects to remain in the United States; (4) the criminal record, if any, of such alien; and (5) such additional matters as may be prescribed by the Commissioner [of Immigration and Naturalization], with the approval of the Attorney General.". This is the question at the c… Course Hero. The case was heard by Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson and Associate Justices Hugo Black, Stanley F. Reed, Felix Frankfurter, William O. Douglas, Robert H. Jackson, Harold H. Burton, and Sherman Minton. The Court argued that although it was unlikely that communists or their sympathizers would overthrow the government, the "evil" they represented "justifies such an invasion of free speech. Petitioners were indicted in July, 1948, for violation of the conspiracy provisions of the Smith Act, 54 Stat. "Dennis v. United States Study Guide." They also acted as a means for the state to monitor and prosecute members of political groups the government felt were too extreme, including legitimately dangerous groups like fascists and simply non-mainstream groups like socialists. While the Smith Act was a response in part to anti-immigrant sentiment in 1940, the years that followed also saw a nationwide paranoia about communists that became known as the Red Scare. In the United States the Red Scare manifested in a number of ways. Although the Cold War continued until the early 1990s, the Red Scare began to fade in the mid-1950s. The Smith Act remained in full effect until 1957 when Yates v. United States restricted the statute's provisions related to conspiracy. Syllabus ; View Case ; Petitioner Eugene Dennis, John B. Williamson, Jacob Stachel, et al.
Course Hero. Brief Fact Summary. "Dennis v. United States Study Guide." Although the Smith Act was passed before the Red Scare, the fear of and hardline stance against communism that resulted in the ruling in Dennis v. the United States can only be understood in the context of this era. Get Dennis v. United States, 341 U.S. 494 (1951), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. In addition, he argues that the Constitution does not defend free speech in cases when that speech is directed at inciting violence against the government. In 1948, eleven Communist Party leaders were convicted of advocating the violent overthrow of the US government and for the violation of several points of the Smith Act.
Their attorneys then decided to challenge the constitutionality of the sentencing on the basis that the Smith Act was a violation of the 1st Amendment right to free speech. Respondent United States . Chief Justice Vinson wrote the majority opinion, which was joined by Justices Reed, Minton, and Burton. Penalties under the Smith Act included high fines and up to 20 years of jail time for citizens and deportation for noncitizens. The Court handed down their decision on June 4, 1951, with six justices concurring and two dissenting. The House Un-American Activities Committee, which was established in 1938, began conducting investigations into communist groups and sympathizers. 13 Dec. 2019. Download a PDF to print or study offline. Course Hero, "Dennis v. United States Study Guide," December 13, 2019, accessed October 1, 2020, https://www.coursehero.com/lit/Dennis-v-United-States/. He also argued that the "clear and present danger" test was a necessary tool that protected the right to free speech, and that he hoped someday the tensions of the present moment would pass to allow for clearer headed perspective on the matter. Stuck? Argued December 4, 1950. Justices Black and Douglas both wrote dissenting opinions in this case. Retrieved October 1, 2020, from https://www.coursehero.com/lit/Dennis-v-United-States/. Following World War II, the communist Soviet Union and the United States became embroiled in the Cold War. Citing other examples of restrictions on free speech and the need to weigh differing interests, Frankfurter argues that the Smith Act does not violate the Constitution but instead protects national security, and that "there is ample justification for a legislative judgment that the conspiracy now before us is a substantial threat to national order and security.". 336 . In a second concurring opinion Justice Jackson argues against the "clear and present danger" test in regard to limitations on free speech by placing the Smith Act and the Dennis case within the context of the U.S. battle against revolutionary radicalism. December 13, 2019. Concurring but separate opinions were written by Justices Frankfurter and Jackson, while dissents were written by Justices Black and Douglas.
Docket no. Share. Jackson goes on to argue that communists "have no scruples" against violence to achieve political ends, and therefore the question of "clear and present danger" is not an adequate means of determining the risk posed by the Communist Party.
During the years that the Smith Act was intact, more than 200 people were indicted under it. He argues that what the men were charged with does not amount to treason and therefore does not pass the "clear and present danger" test, in part because of the improbability of communism posing a real threat to the U.S. government. In 1969 Brandenburg v. Ohio deemed that advocating to overthrow the government was not a crime unless it presented a threat of "imminent lawless action.". On July 20, 1948, 11 members of the Communist Party of the United States of America were arrested for violating the Smith Act. The act was aimed at any group or individual who "prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so ...." The law also criminalized organizing a group that advocated for the overthrow of the government or joining a group that did so. No. All of the men served their five-year sentences, and Eugene Dennis returned to communist leadership after he finished his sentence. In Course Hero. Although the state called on witnesses who claimed to have heard the group calling for the overthrow of the government, the evidence against the defendants was primarily the writings of Vladimir Lenin and Karl Marx, which advocated for a revolution to overthrow capitalism.