They maintained that such “truly independent efforts to provide contraceptive coverage to their employees” would allay their religious objections because they would be removed from the process entirely. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin), Following oral arguments earlier this year, Little Sisters of the Poor and other challengers, could have accommodated the Little Sisters of the Poor all along. It illustrates that the government could have accommodated the Little Sisters of the Poor all along without affecting contraceptive coverage, but chose not to.
create a media culture in America where truth and liberty flourish. ADVERTISEMENT The mission of the Media Research Center is to This would require a separate enrollment process along the lines of how some employers have separate dental, vision, or prescription plans, as well as separate “insurance cards, payment sources, and communication streams.”. The ruling means that all the lower court opinions that went against the religious freedom of the Little Sisters of the Poor and the other religious nonprofits are wiped away and their flawed reasoning cannot be used as precedent in the future. The Little Sisters of the Poor could not in good conscience play such an indispensable part in the machinery that provides abortion-inducing drugs and devices through health plans and infrastructure that they are paying for and providing to their employees. The Little Sisters of the Poor and other challengers suggested, among other things, that the government could require insurance providers to make separate contraceptive plans available to employees whose employer plans do not include such coverage. Many employers, such as the Little Sisters of the Poor, Priests for Life, and religious colleges and charities, object to including Plan B, Ella, contraception, and sterilization in their health insurance plans—a claim the Supreme Court took seriously. Elizabeth Slattery writes about the rule of law, the proper role of the courts, civil rights and equal protection, and the scope of constitutional provisions such as the Commerce Clause and the Recess Appointments Clause as a legal fellow in the Heritage Foundation’s Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies.
This is a victory, not only for the Little Sisters, but for all individuals and organizations who step outside the four walls of a house of worship to serve the poor, heal the sick, or educate the next generation.
According to the Supreme Court, “the government has confirmed” its scheme could be modified in a manner that leaves the Little Sisters of the Poor out of the process, as they requested, while still insuring women employees receive contraceptive coverage. education organization operating under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, and contributions to the MRC are tax-deductible. The MRC is a research and In a unanimous opinion, the Supreme Court “vacated,” meaning erased, all of the lower court cases and required them to reconsider the claims brought by the Little Sisters of the Poor and others that the regulations promulgated pursuant to Obamacare violate their religious exercise in light of the government’s admission that it could indeed provide contraceptive coverage without the Little Sisters’ … But the Supreme Court now says that “the government may not impose taxes or penalties on petitioners for failure to provide the relevant notice.” This is precisely what the Little Sisters of the Poor have been asking for as relief. A traditionally liberal federal appeals court has ruled once again that the Little Sisters of the Poor have to pay for abortions under their health insurance plan under the Obamacare mandate.
Becket Fund …
On Wednesday the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Little Sisters of the Poor v. Burwell, a landmark case challenging the Department of Health and Human Services contraceptive mandate under the Affordable Care Act. Under the challenged regulations, nonprofit employers like the Little Sisters of the Poor must either submit a self-certification form to their insurer or health plan administrator or notify the Department of Health and Human Services of their religious objection to providing contraceptive coverage in writing and provide contact information for their health plan insurer or third-party administrator. Following oral arguments earlier this year, the justices asked the parties to file supplemental briefs, addressing how employees would obtain contraceptive coverage through their employer’s insurance companies without any involvement from the employer, including notifying the government, their insurer, or a third-party administrator of their objection. Editor's Note: This piece was originally published by The Daily Signal.
The Little Sisters of the Poor, a Catholic charitable organization serving impoverished elderly people, fought back in court. CNSNews has emerged as the conservative media’s lynchpin for original reporting, investigative reporting, and breaking news. And now, thanks to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, you can make up to a $300 gift to the 501(c)(3) non-profit organization of your choice and use it as a tax deduction on your 2020 taxes, even if you take the standard deduction on your returns. Failing to provide the objectionable notice meant the Little Sisters of the Poor faced $70 million per year in penalties. $25 a month goes a long way in the fight for a free and fair media. The Supreme Court left the exact details to be worked out among the parties and instructed the lower courts to give them “an opportunity to arrive at an approach going forward that accommodates petitioners’ religious exercise while at the same time ensuring that women covered by petitioners’ health plans ‘receive full and equal health coverage.’”. All Rights Reserved. Roger Severino is the director of the DeVos Center for Religion and Civil Society at The Heritage Foundation.
The media are hard at work weaving a web of confusion, misinformation, and conspiracy surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic. The Supreme Court issued its long-awaited ruling on Monday in the consolidated challenge to Obamacare’s requirement that nonprofit employers collaborate in the provision of employee health insurance coverage that includes abortion-inducing drugs and devices. In a unanimous opinion, the Supreme Court “vacated,” meaning erased, all of the lower court cases and required them to reconsider the claims brought by the Little Sisters of the Poor and others that the regulations promulgated pursuant to Obamacare violate their religious exercise in light of the government’s admission that it could indeed provide contraceptive coverage without the Little Sisters’ collaboration. CNSNews.com is a division of the Media Research Center.
Either way, the actions taken by the employer would authorize the inclusion of coverage of the objectionable drugs and devices in its health plan.
ObamaCare vs. Little Sisters of the Poor The Supreme Court will decide what could be a landmark case for or against religious liberty. Donate today to help CNSNews continue to report on topics that the liberal media refuse to touch.
Sign up for our CNSNews Daily Newsletter to receive the latest news.
A group of nuns from Colorado called the Little Sisters of the Poor had asked for the delay because they object to the law's contraception requirements. Little Sisters of the Poor protest outside of the U.S. Supreme Court. In the coming months, the lower courts will reconsider these challenges, but it is hard to see how the administration and the lower courts can find a way to get around the Supreme Court’s unanimous order—making the decision a big victory for the Little Sisters of the Poor.
In addition to the Little Sisters of the Poor, an order of Catholic nuns whose mission is to “offer the neediest elderly... Get a 20% American Eagle coupon with your new AEO Connected credit card, Get 25% Macy's coupons with email and text sign up, Buy 2 get 1 free on best tops with Forever 21 promo code, WSJ Opinion: Biden to Trump: ‘Will You Shut Up, Man?’, How Tourism Drove Europe’s Second Wave of Covid-19, WSJ Opinion: Bork's Warning Over Judicial Activism Still Haunts Joe Biden, Developers vs. App Store: Apple’s Fights, Explained, Biden, Trump Criticize Each Other Over Issues of Race and Violence, News Corp is a network of leading companies in the worlds of diversified media, news, education, and information services.
And it guarantees that the government cannot force the Little Sisters of the Poor and the other challengers to choose between violating their consciences as the government demands or face crippling fines and penalties. The Little Sisters of the Poor, a Catholic religious group for women who have dedicated their lives to the service of the elderly, won their Supreme Court case on Tuesday against the Obama administration and their contraceptive mandate in Obamacare. It drives the national debate through real, honest journalism—not by misrepresenting or ignoring the facts. The Little Sisters of the Poor, a Catholic institution that provides support for the elderly poor, refused to comply, as did other religious employers, sparking years of litigation. CNSNews covers the stories that the liberal media are afraid to touch. The fight goes back seven years, to the implementation of Obamacare in 2013, when the Obama administration required religious groups to provide contraceptives through health insurance policies they provided as employers.
Copyright © 2020, Media Research Center.
We are part of the only organization purely dedicated to this critical mission and we need your help to fuel this fight.