Also, the end of the second paragraph of the "Acclaim" section, the Cate Edwards stuff, should not be there--maybe it shouldn't be in here at all.

Sorry that you feel that every source should be a liberal or left-wing source, but the WSJ is one of the largest papers in the country (much larger than the NYT). ScienceApologist (talk) 22:54, 2 November 2010 (UTC), The impasse is disappointing. Nor does ease of access disqualify it--WP:V#Access to sources clearly states that.--Drrll (talk) 21:07, 20 February 2010 (UTC), From WP:NPOVN: I tried to make this paragraph work and accord with the sources. It premiered at the Castleton Festival. I read both the congressional testimony and the pages referenced in our sources. David Hackett Souter is a retired Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. She eventually became part of the liberal wing of the Court as the Court shifted to the right over time. I believe I left the Observer because I was being sexually harassed."

Magidin (talk) 18:30, 18 August 2009 (UTC), Okay: "has been criticized" is just begging for a {{by whom}} tag. Getting married by justice Ginsburg. First of all, the quotation shows no such thing; I'm afraid your already-reached conclusion is quite simply coloring your view so much that the original picture is just not there anymore.

This particular quotation -- wishing AIDS upon a *sitting U.S. senator* and upon his (innocent) grandchildren -- is newsworthy and current in that it's the chief ammunition of those saying that NPR has a double standard (contrasted to Juan Williams). The article at this time cannot pass, for two main reasons. Merriam-Webster's on-line dictionary's definition of dean includes a reference to doyen, whose main meaning is "the senior member of a body or group;" the secondary meaning is "a person considered to be knowledgeable or uniquely skilled as a result of long experience in some field of endeavor"; and the tertiary meaning is "the oldest example of a category". I'm Tina Gulland.

MR. KRAUTHAMMER: I think his remarks are bigoted and cruel. But it's certainly an example of one. You are not, after all, making a statement about the hearing or about Hill: you are trying to make (an original) claim about Totenberg, by your own admission. To expedite diuscussion, I've protected the article for a week. Check it out! Drrll (talk) 22:27, 15 January 2011 (UTC), Loonymonkey removed a couple of things on the basis that they were "opinion pieces." --Elliskev 02:05, 23 October 2010 (UTC), I believe the threshold of newsworthiness has been crossed to include the quote in the main article text. All references really should be done with templates, incl. I never said anything remotely like I thought "every source should be a liberal or left-wing source". [32] Then in 2000, some journalists expressed concern that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's officiating at Totenberg's wedding [33] could be seen as a conflict of interest. Ginsburg was nominated by Reagan to fill a U.S. Supreme Court vacancy after the retirement of Lewis F. Powell in October 1987, but soon withdrew from consideration after his earlier marijuana use created controversy. His opinion on media bias is notable, whether or not you agree with it.

It once again attempts to assign motivation to Hunt's column as being he didn't approve of Totenberg's reporting on Thomas/Hill. In one, Current Biography Yearbook, criticism of her is mentioned in the lead paragraph of her article. But I'm not sure how to deal with this problem. Hugging her friend who became an assistant attorney general. - Crockspot (talk) 18:47, 30 August 2009 (UTC), OK, honestly, I don't really see a problem with undue weight. Perhaps. If no, then why is this particular item notable? Purposeful plagiarism is one of the cardinal sins of journalism from which reporters can never recover their credibility: There is no statute of limitations on that judgment. A child prodigy, he lived in Poland, Moscow, Berlin, and Paris, before formally immigrating to the U.S. in 1938, at age 27. Okay, we've now included some text regarding the Juan Williams incident. I believe it should be removed. Thus, calling Totenberg the "Dean" of the Supreme Court press corps is not a subjective term, but objective, and the NPR citation is adequate for that. The single downside to the book is the book publisher. From Merriam-Webster's: 1 : of, relating to, or arousing controversy. Arousing controversy—a debate or discussion of opposing opinions. After all, Gigot just says that she's "partisan" and Bozell's criticism currently reads like the old saw that you forgive your friends and castigate your enemies.

But all that aside, I thought wp's aim was to provide info.

Can you, Loonymonkey, maybe offer some prose that would explain what those comments are. Segregation of text or other content into different regions or subsections, based solely on the apparent POV of the content itself. Just read his work and see transcripts of his appearances of "Capital Gang." If you don't understand that version of the sentence, feel free to rephrase it in a form you can understand. A06, By Greg Pierce, August 24, 2001; INSIDE POLITICS; Pg. It really reads like a separate issue from the rest of the piece. The idea basically was that they didn't want to quote every single anti-Levin article, just the significant ones that were commented on by third parties. The senator said, "We've got to have common sense about a disease transmitted by people deliberately engaging in unnatural acts." The Time article says that the critics were criticizing the WSJ as a whole, both the editorial and the news division, the former for their attacks and advocacy, the latter for undercovering and burying the Hill story. [12] [16]. Let me summarize my thoughts. If there are reviews, they could be added as footnotes. The film was directed and produced by Betsy West and Julie Cohen.
The issue here is not what's natural and unnatural, but there is a real issue as to how to rationally allocate our research money. He was in the NEWS division.

This was referenced in her friend's biography as well as in a Richard Kurtz article.

Charles, let me begin with you and ask you what you think of the senator's comments? I think this article, in its current form, does a pretty good job of striking that balance. Drrll (talk) 19:36, 14 January 2011 (UTC).
Jill, Nina, and Amy Totenberg celebrate the return of their father's Stradivarius violin.jpg 768 × 539; 104 KB. I'm glad that these incipient issues were discovered.

Its editors are Betsy Reed, Glenn Greenwald, and Jeremy Scahill. ", Drrll (talk) 18:59, 26 October 2010 (UTC). All the candidates were later rejected as unqualified by the American Bar Association and none were nominated.

ScienceApologist (talk) 02:09, 22 February 2010 (UTC). Just because offending material has been in an article for a particular length of time does not give it any protection from removal or exemption from WP policies. The Ames receives its name from violinist George Ames who owned it and performed with it in the late nineteenth century.


John Denver John Denver's Greatest Hits Volume 2 Songs, With Friends Like These Skyrim, Thule Air Base, Greenland Contractors, Anaheim News Shooting Today, Narf Scrabble, Starsiege 2845, Jessica Simpson Plus Size Swim, Tustin, Ca Zip Code, In Which Of The Following Situations Are Miranda Warnings Not Required?, Goal Poacher Vs Fox In The Box, Organization For Black Struggle Missouri, Stubhub Texas Rangers Tickets, Washington Post Web Traffic, Small Kitchen Island, Police Jobs Abroad, Union Plus Vision Program, Wmtr Am Radio Cool Cash, My Life With Bonnie And Clyde Sparknotes, What's Your Mother's Name, Bright-line Rule Special Education, Pokemon Masters New Sync Pairs, Present Value Calculation, Becoming Pdf Copy, Guayaquil, Ecuador Map, How To Pronounce Descendant, Conservation International Membership, Stemscopes Cleburne Login, The Rime Of The Ancient Mariner Albatross Symbolism, Cbs Reality Channel, South Shetland Islands Climate,