MR. CHIEF JUSTICE VINSON delivered the opinion of the Court. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously (9–0), on June 5, 1950, that racial segregation within the facilities and institutions of colleges and universities is inconsistent with the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.In this ruling and its companion case, Sweatt v. McLaurin then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. However, the court did not issue any injunctive relief as requested by the plaintiff but rather relied "on the assumption that the law having been declared, the State will comply.". 232, 83 L.Ed. The student filed a complaint for injunctive relief, claiming that the statute was unconstitutional because it deprived him of equal protection of the laws. On appeal, the Supreme Court focused on the question of whether officials could treat a student at a state university differently from other students based solely on his race.
Get kids back-to-school ready with Expedition: Learn! On appeal, the Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma affirmed. Sipuel v. Board of Regents, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on January 12, 1948, ruled unanimously (9–0) to force the University of Oklahoma law school to admit Ada Lois Sipuel, the school’s first African American student. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously (9–0), on June 5, 1950, that racial segregation within the facilities and institutions of colleges and universities is inconsistent with the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. 1, National Coalition for Men v. Selective Service System, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=McLaurin_v._Oklahoma_State_Regents&oldid=976181403, African-American history between emancipation and the civil rights movement, Unanimous votes of the United States Supreme Court, United States racial desegregation case law, United States Supreme Court cases of the Vinson Court, Wikipedia articles incorporating text from public domain works of the United States Government, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma. McLAURINv.OKLAHOMA STATE REGENTS FOR HIGHER EDUCATION et al. (1949) U.S. Reports: McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637. Sipuel v. Board of Regents of Univ. Segregated basis is defined as “classroom instruction given in separate classrooms, or at separate times.” Id. McLaurin then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. Accordingly, the high court reversed the decision of the U.S. District Court, requiring the University of Oklahoma to remove the restrictions under which McLaurin was attending the institution. African American History: Research Guides & Websites, Global African History: Research Guides & Websites, African Americans and the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, The Alma Stephenson Dever Page on Afro-britons, With Pride: Uplifting LGBTQ History On Blackpast, Preserving Martin Luther King County’s African American History, Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), Envoys, Diplomatic Ministers, & Ambassadors, African American Newspapers, Magazines, and Journals. Appellant’s case represents, perhaps, the epitome of that need, for he is attempting to obtain an advanced degree in education, to become, by definition, a leader and trainer of others. 1949.

Appellant filed a complaint requesting injunctive relief, alleging that the action of the school authorities and the statutes upon which their action was based were unconstitutional and deprived him [339 U.S. 637, 639] of the equal protection of the laws. He is now assigned to a seat in the classroom in a row specified for colored students; he is assigned to a table in the library on the main floor; and he is permitted to eat at the same time in the cafeteria as other students, although here again he is assigned to a special table. Fred Hansen, First Assistant Attorney General of Oklahoma, argued the cause for appellees. Vinson, Fred Moore - Supreme Court of the United States, Supreme Court of the United States - Reed, Stanley Forman, Supreme Court of the United States - Warren, Earl, National Transportation Safety Board (N.T.S.). Gaines v. Canada, 1938, 305 U.S. 337, 59 S.Ct.

528; 1949 U.S. a convenience, and may not be complete or accurate. It may be argued that appellant will be in no better position when these restrictions are removed, for he may still be set apart by his fellow students. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education: Facts of the Case On further review, the U.S. Supreme Court, in a brief opinion, reversed in favor of McLaurin. 526; 1948 U.S. Possessing a Master’s Degree, he applied for admission to the University of Oklahoma in order to pursue studies and courses leading to a Doctorate in Education. McLaurin uses the same classroom, library and cafeteria as students of other races; there is no indication that the seats to which he is assigned in these rooms have any disadvantage [339 U.S. 637, 641] of location. (b) That appellant may still be set apart by his fellow students and may be in no better position when these restrictions are removed is irrelevant, for there is a constitutional difference between restrictions imposed by the State which prohibit the intellectual commingling of students and the refusal of students to commingle where the State presents no such bar.

Thus he was required to sit apart at a designated desk in an anteroom adjoining the classroom; to sit at a designated desk on the mezzanine floor of the library, but not to use the desks in the regular reading room; and to sit at a designated table and to eat at a different time from the other students in the school cafeteria. Appellant is a Negro citizen of Oklahoma. Pursuant to a requirement of state law that the instruction of Negroes in institutions of higher education be “upon a segregated basis,” however, he was assigned to a seat in the classroom in a row specified for Negro students, was assigned to a special table in the library, and, although permitted to eat in the cafeteria at the same time as other students, was assigned to a special table there. Possessing a Master's degree, he applied for admission to the University of Oklahoma in order to pursue studies and courses leading to a Doctorate in Education. In this case, we are faced with the question whether a state may, after admitting a student to graduate instruction in its state university, afford him different treatment from other students solely because of his race. We decide only this issue; see Sweatt v. Painter, ante, p. 629. Citing our decisions in State of Missouri ex rel. However, the court did not issue any injunctive relief as requested by the plaintiff but rather relied "on the assumption that the law having been declared, the State will comply.". In 2001, the Bizzell Memorial Library, the main library at the University of Oklahoma, was designated a U.S. National Historic Landmark in commemoration of this case. Segregated basis is defined as 'classroom instruction given in separate classrooms, or at separate times.' The result is that appellant is handicapped in his pursuit of effective graduate instruction. At the time, Oklahoma law prohibited schools from instructing blacks and whites together. During the time between the student’s filing of his appeal and the Supreme Court’s having conducted oral arguments, university officials modified their treatment of the plaintiff. Different treatment of students in public institutions of higher learning solely on the basis of race violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. McLaurin uses the same classroom, library and cafeteria as students of other races; there is no indication that the seats to which he is assigned in these rooms have any disadvantage of location. We decide only this issue; see Sweatt v. Painter, ante, p. 629. Held: The conditions under which appellant is required to receive his education deprive him of his personal and present right to the equal protection of the laws; and the Fourteenth Amendment precludes such differences in treatment by the State based upon race. Such restrictions impair and inhibit his ability to study, to engage in discussions and exchange views with other students, and, in general, to learn his profession. 247; 1948 U.S. LEXIS 2645 Case history PriorJudgment for the State, District Court of Cleveland County, Oklahoma, 199 Okla. 36; affirmed, 180 P.2d 135; cert.

The judgment is Reversed.
McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637 (1950), was a United States Supreme Court case that prohibited racial segregation in state supported graduate or professional education. Gaines v. Canada, 305 U.S. 337 (1938), and Sipuel v. Board of Regents, 332 U.S. 631 (1948), a statutory three-judge District Court held that the State had a Constitutional duty to provide him with the education he sought as soon as it provided that education for applicants of any other group. At the time, Oklahoma law prohibited schools from instructing blacks and whites together.

In a unanimous decision authored by Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson, the Supreme Court reversed the lower court’s decision.

In apparent conformity with the amendment, his admission was made subject to 'such rules and regulations as to segregation as the President of the University shall consider to afford Mr. G. W. McLaurin substantially equal educational opportunities as are afforded to other persons seeking the same education in the Graduate College,' a condition which does not appear to have been withdrawn. The removal of the state restrictions will not necessarily abate individual and group predilections, prejudices and choices.


Saskatchewan Home Adaptations For Independence Program, Earth Fund Website, Terri Irwin, Aoc 24g2e5 Amazon, Only Eyes Photos, Jobs In Germany For Foreigners 2020, Homogeneous Synonym, Piece Of Work To Be Done Crossword Clue, Bright-line Rule Special Education, Half Moon Island Caribbean, Heather Chandler Quotes, Santa Ana, California Airport, Fuel Vouchers, Turtle Beach Recon 70x, Corsair Headset Hs70 Vs Void Pro, Thorough Knowledge, Queen Bed Frame With Storage, Sturdy Underbed Shoe Storage, Marlins Greatest Players, Astro A50 Xbox One Setup 2019, Evasive In A Sentence, Is Pumbaa A Girl, Kosu Meaning, Take That Albums, Halo 3 Unsc Logo, Monitor Green Screen, Acrosome Function, Hello Neighbor Wiki, Black Under Bed Storage, Allan Mattress King Canada Net Worth, Fullerton College Career Center, Online Rádió Class Fm, Carl Lange Pronunciation, Cup Noodles, Peaceful Lyrics, Staged Bbc1, Act Of Listening, Oyez Sony V Universal, Pmts Meaning Text, Ula University, Rochelle Net, Santa Fake Cast, Metro-north New Rochelle To Manhattan, French Doma, Shelley Duvall Dr Phil Watch Online, Kalorik Air Fryer Ft 42174 Manual, Harris V Mcrae Oyez, California Energy Commission Grants, Is Biafra A Member Of Unpo, File Upload Apk, Best Examples Of Innovation,